3 entities actively seeking solutions — right now.

Pursuit detects live AI procurement signals from NC, CT, and MD agencies—evaluation frameworks, safe harbor programs, and statewide implementation mandates—before RFPs drop. Three of thousands: act now with Labelbox or lose to competitors already positioned.

See the Full Platform

See 3 opportunities ↓

SLED entities monitored

110K+

Documents processed monthly

3M+

Before RFPs drop

6–18mo

Earlier than the competition

92 days

From 110K+ entities monitored

Pre-RFP signals for

<div class='ecard'><div class='ecard-header'><div><div class='ecard-name'>General Assembly</div><div class='ecard-meta'>County Government · NC</div></div><div class='ecard-header-right'><span class='badge badge-hot'>High Intent</span></div></div><div class='ecard-signals'><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>Department of Public Instruction establishing AI tools evaluation framework</div><div class='signal-body-text'>The General Assembly is requiring the Department of Public Instruction to establish and annually update an AI tool evaluation framework, along with procurement guidance for reviewed tools. This initiative directly creates demand for data labeling, human annotation, and LLM evaluation services to assess AI systems against defined criteria. No RFP has been issued; this is pre-solicitation intelligence.</div></div><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>Annual AI tool reviews drive procurement guidance updates</div><div class='signal-body-text'>General Assembly's annual review mandate creates recurring budget cycles and sustained procurement activity, ensuring predictable demand for evaluation and compliance services. By establishing formal procurement guidance, the Department of Public Instruction reduces vendor selection risk and accelerates adoption timelines—directly improving operational efficiency in AI tool deployment across schools.</div></div></div><div class='ecard-contacts'><div class='ecard-contacts-label'>Key Contacts · 5 verified by Pursuit</div><div class='contact-list'><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Peter Capriglione</span><span class='contact-title'>Director</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Tom Taylor</span><span class='contact-title'>Chief Information Security Officer</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Paul Lowe</span><span class='contact-title'>Senator</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Jay Chaudhuri</span><span class='contact-title'>Senator</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Matthew Winslow</span><span class='contact-title'>Representative</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div></div></div><div class='ecard-footer'><a class='ecard-source-link' href='https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewNewsFile/117/S257-CCSNExr-2%20v78#page=159' target='_blank'>View source · 2026-07-01</a><span class='ecard-timing'>⏱ Pre-RFP — no solicitation issued</span></div></div> <div class='ecard'><div class='ecard-header'><div><div class='ecard-name'>General Assembly</div><div class='ecard-meta'>County Government · CT</div></div><div class='ecard-header-right'><span class='badge badge-active'>Active Signal</span></div></div><div class='ecard-signals'><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>DCP commissioner reviewing AI safe harbor program applications</div><div class='signal-body-text'>The General Assembly is actively discussing AI safe harbor programs, with the DCP commissioner responsible for reviewing applications and assessing compliance mechanisms and disciplinary actions. This initiative requires data labeling, human annotation, and LLM evaluation services to support compliance assessment and model validation. No RFP has been issued yet.</div></div><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>General Assembly seeks quality training data for AI model development</div><div class='signal-body-text'>General Assembly faces operational risk if AI safe harbor applications lack rigorous compliance validation, potentially exposing the agency to regulatory exposure and reputational damage. Establishing robust disciplinary frameworks and audit trails through structured data evaluation reduces liability and accelerates approval timelines, directly supporting the DCP commissioner's mandate.</div></div></div><div class='ecard-contacts'><div class='ecard-contacts-label'>Key Contacts · 1 verified by Pursuit</div><div class='contact-list'><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Paul Varsanik</span><span class='contact-title'>Chief Information Officer</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div></div></div><div class='ecard-footer'><a class='ecard-source-link' href='https://www.cga.ct.gov/2026/ba/pdf/2026SB-00005-R000338-BA.pdf#page=33' target='_blank'>View source · 2026-10-01</a><span class='ecard-timing'>⏱ Pre-RFP — no solicitation issued</span></div></div> <div class='ecard'><div class='ecard-header'><div><div class='ecard-name'>State of Maryland</div><div class='ecard-meta'>County Government · MD</div></div><div class='ecard-header-right'><span class='badge badge-active'>Active Signal</span></div></div><div class='ecard-signals'><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>DoIT and DGS submitting joint report on artificial intelligence implementation</div><div class='signal-body-text'>Maryland's Department of Information Technology and Department of General Services are required to submit a joint report on statewide AI implementation, procurement, and impact assessments. This initiative directly aligns with needs for data labeling, human annotation, training data management, and LLM evaluation services to support responsible AI deployment. No RFP has been issued yet—this is pre-solicitation intelligence.</div></div><div class='signal-item'><div class='signal-title'>Maryland agencies seek quality training data for AI systems</div><div class='signal-body-text'>State of Maryland faces budget constraints and compliance risks if AI procurement decisions lack documented quality assurance and impact measurement. By establishing rigorous evaluation and training data governance now, the state reduces costly system failures and positions itself to demonstrate fiscal accountability to stakeholders and oversight bodies.</div></div></div><div class='ecard-contacts'><div class='ecard-contacts-label'>Key Contacts · 5 verified by Pursuit</div><div class='contact-list'><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Katie Savage</span><span class='contact-title'>Secretary of Information Technology</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Natalie Evans Harris</span><span class='contact-title'>State Chief Data Officer</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Mark Mondor</span><span class='contact-title'>Director</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Cynthia Washington</span><span class='contact-title'>Contact</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div><div class='contact-row'><div class='contact-info'><span class='contact-name'>Chris Krawiec</span><span class='contact-title'>Director</span></div><div class='contact-data-hints'><span class='data-hint'>Email</span><span class='data-hint'>Phone</span></div></div></div></div><div class='ecard-footer'><a class='ecard-source-link' href='https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2026_Senate_EBA_Subcommittee_Report.pdf#page=16' target='_blank'>View source · 2026-11-01</a><span class='ecard-timing'>⏱ Pre-RFP — no solicitation issued</span></div></div>

Why needs Pursuit

92 days

Earlier to every deal

Pursuit customers engage an average of 92 days before the competition finds the same opportunity — giving Keeper Security's team time to shape the deal and show up as the trusted partner before any RFP is written.

2.5M

Documents processed monthly

Pursuit reads 2.5 million government documents monthly — meeting minutes, strategic plans, budget filings, and FOIA records — surfacing the signals that matter to Keeper Security's ICP before they become public solicitations.

73%

Of deals are decided before the RFP drops

By the time a formal solicitation is published, the winning vendor is usually already in the room. Pursuit gets your team there first — with the context, contacts, and credibility to shape the deal before anyone else knows it exists.

SCHEDULE DEMO

See Labelbox's full pipeline in Pursuit

These three are a sample of what Pursuit surfaces for Labelbox across 110,000+ entities matched to your ICP. Book time to see your full ICP‑matched opportunity list — with contacts, signals, and source documents for every account.

TRUSTED BY